A team of international researchers have described a new dinosaur based on fossils found in Zimbabwe. This newly described sauropodomorph named Musango matusadonaensis lived during the Late Triassic (Norian faunal stage), around 210 million years ago. Musango is the fifth dinosaur to be named from fossils discovered in Zimbabwe. Furthermore, these fossils further support the idea of distinct dinosaur communities in southern Africa during the Late Triassic. Previously, scientists had thought that there were close faunal and biostratigraphical links between the Late Triassic vertebrate faunas of Zimbabwe and South Africa. Currently, no dinosaur taxa are shared between the Triassic-aged sedimentary units in Zimbabwe and those of the main Karoo Basin of South Africa and Lesotho.

A life reconstruction of the fifth dinosaur to be named from fossils found in Zimbabwe (Musango matusadonaensis). Picture credit: Mark Witton.

Picture credit: Mark Witton

The fossils were discovered on the shores of Lake Kariba in northern Zimbabwe. Moreover, the find provides fresh evidence that southern Africa preserves an important record of early dinosaur evolution.

Musango matusadonaensis – A New Member of the Sauropodomorpha

Musango matusadonaensis is classified as an early member of the Sauropodomorpha, a group of dinosaurs that eventually gave rise to giant, long-necked herbivores such as Brachiosaurus and Diplodocus. However, unlike its enormous descendants, M. matusadonaensis was a relatively small, lightly built dinosaur that probably walked on two legs. The fossils were found in association with each other but not articulated. The material consists of a partial skeleton consisting of five dorsal vertebrae, two sacral vertebrae, a left scapula and coracoid along with a partial left ilium; a right pubis and elements from the limbs. In addition, several indeterminate bone fragments were recovered.

The absence of a femur makes size estimation difficult.  However, based on comparisons with other Late Triassic sauropodomorphs, the specimen (NHMZ 2583) represents a four and a half metre long individual.  This dinosaur is estimated to have weighed around 220 kilograms.

Musango matusadonaensis silhouette showing known fossil material. Scale bar equals 1 metre. Picture credit: Brandon Stuart with additional annotation by Everything Dinosaur.

Picture credit: Brandon Stuart with additional annotation by Everything Dinosaur

While the skull has not yet been found, researchers believe that Musango was probably herbivorous or perhaps omnivorous.

Revealing Ancient African Ecosystems

The Late Triassic was a pivotal period in Earth’s history. Dinosaurs had evolved, but they had not yet become the dominant terrestrial vertebrates they would be during the Jurassic and Cretaceous. For many years, scientists assumed that dinosaur faunas across southern Africa were broadly similar. However, discoveries from Zimbabwe are beginning to challenge this long-held view.

Professor Paul Barrett, Merit Researcher at the Natural History Museum, London, and the study’s lead author, commented:

“Until recently, it was assumed that the dinosaurs living across southern Africa were largely the same. However, these discoveries are showing that this part of the ancient supercontinent Gondwana was actually made of a series of smaller ecosystems – each with a different cast of characters.”

Professor Paul Barrett (London Natural History Museum) carefully excavating fossil material on the shores of Lake Kariba. Picture credit: Paul Barrett.

Picture credit: Paul Barrett

The Fifth Dinosaur to be Described from Zimbabwe

The first dinosaur to be named from Zimbabwe was the coelophysoid “Syntarsus” rhodesiensis which was formally named and described in 1969. However, the genus name was already assigned, so it was moved to the genus Megapnosaurus, although the fossils may represent a species of Coelophysis.

The five dinosaurs known from Zimbabwe:

1. “Syntarsus” – Megapnosaurus (possibly Coelophysis) – a small theropod dinosaur.
2. Vulcanodon karibaensis – a primitive sauropod.
3. Mbiresaurus raathi – a basal sauropodomorph named in 2022 that is geologically older than Musango matusadonaensis (Griffen et al).
4. Musankwa sanyatiensis – a basal sauropodomorph named in 2024 (Barrett et al) which was coeval with M. matusadonaensis.
5. Musango matusadonaensis (Barret et al, 2026).

To read our article from 2024 about Musankwa sanyatiensis, the fourth dinosaur to be described from Zimbabwe: A New Sauropodomorph from Zimbabwe (2024).

The discovery of several sauropodomorphs in this locality highlights the significance of southern Africa to researchers examining the evolution of the sauropod lineage.

Analysis of the Musango fossil bones indicates that the individual was around eight years old and approaching full adult size when it died. Interestingly, the skeleton also preserves evidence that the dinosaur survived a serious injury or infection during its lifetime. This suggests it recovered successfully before eventually dying from another cause.

Life in an Ancient River Ecosystem

During the Late Triassic, the landscape of present-day Zimbabwe looked very different from today. Rivers and streams crossed the region, supporting a wide range of plants and animals. Musango matusadonaensis shared its habitat with lungfish, crocodile-like phytosaurs and other dinosaurs, including Musankwa sanyatiensis. As fieldwork continues, researchers expect many more species to emerge from these fossil-rich rocks.

Professor Paul Barrett believes these discoveries are only the beginning:

“It suggests that what we’ve found so far is only the tip of the iceberg. We’ve already got one other new species that we’ve yet to describe, while our team has been told about other fossils from the region that we’ve yet to look at. I think it’s likely there are even more dinosaurs still to be found there.”

The ilium of the newly described sauropodomorph from Zimbabwe (Musango matusadonaensis). Picture credit: Brandon Stuart.

Picture credit: Brandon Stuart

An International Scientific Collaboration

The research forms part of an ongoing collaboration between scientists from Zimbabwe, South Africa and the United Kingdom. Together, they are exploring regions that have received relatively little palaeontological attention compared to Europe, China and North America. As a result, these discoveries are helping fill important gaps in the fossil record. They also demonstrate that Africa played a significant role in the early evolution and diversification of dinosaurs.

Professor Jonah Choiniere, leader of the expedition and a co-author from Johannesburg’s Evolutionary Studies Institute, explained:

“New dinosaur species like Musango show the value of doing palaeontological fieldwork in remote, and often scenically beautiful, places. This study is the result of a thriving international collaboration between the UK, South Africa and Zimbabwe, and reinforces the importance of southern Africa in understanding dinosaur diversity.”

Musango matusadonaensis Etymology

The name of this new dinosaur reflects both the local language and the discovery site. Musango comes from the ChiShona language and means “living in the bush”, referring to the remote location where the dinosaur was unearthed. Meanwhile, the species name honours the nearby Matusadona National Park.

The discovery of the fifth dinosaur from Zimbabwe adds another important piece to the puzzle of dinosaur evolution. Moreover, it highlights the scientific importance of the country’s fossil record. As exploration continues, palaeontologists hope that many more prehistoric species will emerge from this remarkable part of Gondwana.

Everything Dinosaur acknowledges the assistance of a media release from the London Natural History Museum in the compilation of this article.

The scientific paper: “A new sauropodomorph dinosaur from the Pebbly Arkose Formation (Upper Triassic: Norian) of Kariba, Zimbabwe” by Paul M. Barrett, Jennifer Botha, Lara Sciscioe, Brandon P. Stuart, Jack Lovegrove, Darlington Munyikwa, Michel Zondo, Timothy J. Broderick, Steve F. Edwards, Edward Mbambo, Kimberley E. J. Chapelle, Kathleen N. Dollman, Steve Tolan and Jonah N. Choiniere published in the Journal of Systematic Palaeontology.

The award-winning Everything Dinosaur website: Sauropod Models and Dinosaur Figures.

Could giant sauropod dinosaurs stand up on their hind legs? A newly published study has explored this long-debated question using advanced digital biomechanical modelling. The research suggests that although many sauropods were capable of rearing up, the largest species probably found it much more difficult to maintain this posture.  The paper published as an open-access article in the journal “Palaeontology”, is the first to use finite element analysis (FEA) to examine sauropod rearing behaviour.

A model depicting a rearing Diplodocus.  This is the 2020 CollectA Age of Dinosaurs rearing Diplodocus model. Previous studies (Mallison, 2011) had proposed that Diplodocus with its centre of mass located posteriorly may have been able to rear up more easily than other taxa. However, these results provide no strong evidence to indicate that rearing was a frequent behaviour for Diplodocus. Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur.

Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur

Sauropods, such as Diplodocus, Giraffatitan, Dreadnoughtus and Patagotitan, were the some of the largest terrestrial animals to have ever lived. Their immense size, long necks and pillar-like limbs have fascinated palaeontologists for more than a century. One of the enduring questions surrounding these giants is whether they could raise themselves into a bipedal or tripodal stance. Sauropod rearing behaviour may have occurred to permit them to reach higher branches in trees to feed. In addition, adopting a rearing pose may have helped to intimidate rivals or to defend themselves from carnivorous theropods. Perhaps rearing behaviour could have played role in social display, courtship or mating.

A Haolonggood Sauroposeidon figure depicted in a tripodal rearing pose.  The dinosaur’s huge weight is supported by its massive hind legs and muscular tail.  However, the new study concludes that larger sauropods were probably less capable of maintaining a rearing pose for sustained periods.

Testing Sauropod Rearing Behaviour

The new study, published in the journal Palaeontology, examined the hind limb biomechanics of seven sauropod genera representing a range of sizes and evolutionary groups. Rather than relying solely on skeletal anatomy, the researchers created detailed three-dimensional digital models of the femora (thigh bones) and subjected them to finite element analysis (FEA). This engineering technique predicts how a structure responds to forces and stresses and is widely used in the design of buildings, aircraft and vehicles.

The seven sauropod genera included in the study:

1. Amargasaurus – a dicraeosaurid known from the Early Cretaceous of Argentina estimated to have reached a length of 12 metres and weighing 5 tonnes.
2. Australotitan – of the Somphospondyli clade from the Late Cretaceous of Australia with some estimates suggesting a body length around 30 metres and weighing more than 50 tonnes.
3. Diplodocus – a diplodocid from the Late Jurassic of North America reaching a length of around 27 metres and weighing an estimated 10-20 tonnes.
4. Dreadnoughtus – a lithostrotian titanosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Argentina approximately 26 metres long and weighing 48-49 tonnes.
5. Giraffatitan – a brachiosaurid from the Late Jurassic of Tanzania estimated to reach a length of 23 metres and to weigh over 40 tonnes.
6. Neuquensaurus – a saltasaurid from the Late Cretaceous of Argentina estimated to reach a length of around 9 metres and to weigh 3.5 tonnes.
7. Uberabatitan – a lithostrotian titanosaur known from the Late Cretaceous of Brazil around 26 metres in length and weighing more than 30 tonnes.

Our detailed guide explaining whether sauropods could stand on their hind legs will be published shortly.

Two Different Femora Load Scenarios

The scientists modelled two different loading scenarios. One simulated how the femora would respond to the animal’s body weight during a rearing posture. The second incorporated the forces generated by the surrounding muscles. By comparing the stress experienced by each femur, the team assessed how well different sauropods may have coped with standing on their hind limbs.

Extrinsic functional scenario modelled in the study. A, 3D rendering of the femur of Uberabatitan (CPPLIP-1238) in posterior view, with the red arrow showing the position of the applied loads. B, representation of the constraints (yellow circles) applied to all models for the extrinsic scenarios. Picture credit: Silva Junior et al. (2025), Palaeontology. Reproduced under the terms of the applicable Creative Commons licence.

Picture credit: Silva Junior et al. (2025), Palaeontology. Reproduced under the terms of the applicable Creative Commons licence.

Smaller Sauropods Had an Advantage

The results indicate that body size played a major role in determining how effectively a sauropod could rear up. Smaller species generally experienced lower levels of stress within their femora. In particular, the saltasaurid titanosaur Neuquensaurus performed exceptionally well in the simulations. Its relatively robust femur and favourable muscle attachment sites suggest that it may have been capable of maintaining a rearing posture for longer periods.

In contrast, enormous titanosaurs such as Dreadnoughtus experienced much higher levels of stress within their hind limbs. This finding suggests that although these giants may have been able to rear briefly, maintaining such a posture would have placed considerable demands on their skeleton.

Juveniles may have been more capable of rearing than adults.  This opens up the intriguing possibility of sauropod rearing behaviour permitting ontogenetic niche partitioning. Sauropods may have changed their rearing behaviour as they grew and matured.

Interestingly, the study also compared Diplodocus and Giraffatitan, two sauropods that have featured prominently in previous discussions about rearing behaviour. The new biomechanical analysis broadly supports earlier research suggesting that differences in body shape and centre of mass influenced how easily these dinosaurs could adopt an upright stance. For example, the researchers conclude that Diplodocus was more capable of rearing than a brachiosaur such as Giraffatitan. However, the stress forces in the femur were still relatively high. Therefore, the study authors postulate that rearing for a Diplodocus was not a routine or frequent behaviour.

The giant Giraffatitan brancai skeleton on display at the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin. Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur.

Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur

Sauropod Rearing Behaviour Probably More Than Just Feeding

For many years, palaeontologists have suggested that rearing allowed sauropods to browse vegetation beyond the reach of other herbivores. However, the researchers point out that this behaviour may also have served several other important functions.

Standing upright could have helped during defensive displays, combat between rivals or mating. Furthermore, the authors note that sauropods may not always have reared unsupported. Leaning against a tree while feeding, or using a mate for additional support during courtship, would have reduced the stresses acting on the hind limbs.

Finite element analysis of stress on femora with applied load of 24,500 N to sauropod femora in anterior (left) and posterior (right) views of: Amargasaurus (A); (B), Australotitan; (C), Diplodocus; (D), Dreadnoughtus; (E), Giraffatitan; (F), Neuquensaurus and Uberabatitan (G). Regions displayed in white indicate stress value that exceed the upper limit of the defined scale. Picture credit: Silva Junior et al. (2025), Palaeontology. Reproduced under the terms of the applicable Creative Commons licence.

Picture credit: Silva Junior et al. (2025), Palaeontology. Reproduced under the terms of the applicable Creative Commons licence.

A New Perspective

This is the first study to use finite element analysis specifically to investigate sauropod rearing behaviour. As with any computer model, there are limitations. The digital reconstructions do not include the complex internal structure of bone or the cushioning effects of cartilage. Consequently, the stress values should be viewed as comparative rather than absolute.

Nevertheless, the research provides fresh insight into the lives of the largest terrestrial animals known to science. Rather than treating all sauropods alike, the study demonstrates that anatomy, body size and muscle configuration all influenced their ability to rear up. The findings suggest that some smaller sauropods may have been surprisingly agile, while the largest species were constrained by the sheer scale of their bodies.

Commenting on the research, Mike from Everything Dinosaur explained:

“Sauropods have always challenged our understanding of biomechanics. After all, there are no extant animals analogous to them. This study shows how modern digital techniques can test ideas that were once based largely on educated guesswork. It demonstrates that even among the giant sauropods, anatomy mattered, and not every species would have behaved in exactly the same way.”

The study provides another excellent example of how engineering, computer modelling and palaeontology are working together to answer questions about dinosaur behaviour that would have seemed impossible to investigate just a few decades ago.

The scientific paper: “Standing giants: a digital biomechanical model for bipedal postures in sauropod dinosaurs” by Julian C. G. Silva Junior, Gabriel S. Ferreira, Agustín G. Martinelli, Thiago S. Marinho, Felipe C. Montefeltro published in the journal Palaeontology.

Models of sauropods and other prehistoric animals: Sauropod and Other Dinosaur Models.

A remarkable trace fossil from Germany has provided the oldest known evidence of a cloaca in the mammalian lineage. The discovery helps palaeontologists better understand the evolution of early terrestrial vertebrates and fills an important gap in the fossil record. The fossil comes from the famous Bromacker fossil locality in Thuringia (Germany). Among footprints and other trace fossils the scientists identified a tail impression. The anterior portion of this tail impression preserves evidence of the earliest synapsid cloaca.

The international team of researchers, led by scientists from the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, published their findings in the journal “iScience”. The trace fossils are approximately 294 million years old (Early Permian). This represents the first occurrence of a cloaca in the fossil record of stem mammals.

The trace fossil specimen MNG 13490 with the preserved underside of the tail impression. Note scale bar equals 10 cm. Picture credit: Marchetti et al.

Picture credit: Marchetti et al

A Rare Glimpse of Soft Tissue Preservation

Fossils usually preserve bones and teeth. Soft tissues, however, almost always decay before fossilisation can occur. Consequently, direct evidence of anatomical features such as the cloaca is exceptionally rare. The newly described specimen includes a beautifully preserved impression of the tail together with fossil footprints. Near the base of the tail, the researchers identified two rows of raised scales separated by a narrow vertical slit. They interpret these features as the lips and opening of a cloaca.

This fossil provides the first direct evidence of an earliest synapsid cloaca, offering scientists an unprecedented look at the anatomy of an animal closely related to the ancestors of mammals.

The caseid synapsid tail impression. Note scale bar equals 5 cm. Picture credit: Marchetti et al.

Picture credit: Marchetti et al

What is a Cloaca?

A cloaca is a single external opening used by the digestive, urinary and reproductive systems. Today, amphibians, reptiles and birds possess a cloaca. Among mammals, however, only monotremes such as the platypus and echidnas have retained this feature. Most extant mammals (placentals and marsupials) have separate openings for these bodily functions. Until now, scientists had little direct fossil evidence showing how this important anatomical structure appeared in the mammalian lineage.

An Early Relative of Mammals

The fossil traces have been linked to a caseid synapsid. Caseids were large-bodied, herbivorous members of the Synapsida, the evolutionary group that eventually gave rise to the Mammalia. Researchers matched the fossil impression with the distinctive Dimetropus footprints found at the Bromacker locality. Comparisons with skeletal fossils collected from the same site strengthened this interpretation.

Although caseids looked very different from mammals today, they belonged to the same broad evolutionary lineage. Therefore, this discovery provides valuable information about the early stages of mammalian evolution.

The cloacal area in the anterior part of the tail impression. Note scale bar equals 5 cm. Picture credit: Marchetti et al.

Picture credit: Marchetti et al

New study highlights the growth rates of diminutive Dimetrodon species from the Bromacker locality: Bromacker Dimetrodon Growth Study.

Why Did the Cloaca Evolve?

The study also explores why the cloaca changed during vertebrate evolution. Although the answer remains uncertain, the researchers suggest several possible explanations.

For example, changes in reproductive anatomy may have played a role. Likewise, increasingly dry environments could have influenced the evolution of different body structures. The scientists also propose that evaporative cooling through the cloacal opening may have helped animals regulate their body temperature. Furthermore, changes in body shape, including shorter tails and modified limbs, may have contributed to these evolutionary developments.

In squamates and birds, the cloaca tends to have a horizontal orientation. Cloacal evaporation for thermoregulation purposes has been observed in squamates and birds. In contrast, the Crocodylomorpha and the Caudata (salamanders and their extinct relatives), have a vertical cloaca. These animals are associated with aquatic environments. Intriguingly, the fossilised tail impression is clearly impressed in a water-saturated sediment.

The fossil specimen shows swimming traces associated with Dimetropus footprints. Therefore, it is possible that a transition from a vertical to a horizontal cloaca occurred as an adaptation to drier environments. The horizontal orientation of the cloacal orifice could favour more efficient cloacal evaporation to help maintain body temperature. This would be in agreement with the vent orientation change in stem reptiles between the Carboniferous and the Permian, in a time of global warming and increasing aridity and seasonality. Nevertheless, the causes of this correlation should be further investigated in modern taxa.

The Significance of the Bromacker Fossil Site

The Bromacker fossil locality is recognised as one of the world’s most important Late Palaeozoic fossil sites. It has produced an exceptional record of terrestrial animals and plants that lived during the Early Permian. This latest discovery also demonstrates the value of revisiting historic museum collections. Modern imaging techniques and careful re-examination can reveal important anatomical details that earlier researchers could not detect.

A false-colour depth map of the cloacal area taken from the photogrammetric 3D model. Picture credit: Marchetti et al.

Picture credit: Marchetti et al

Understanding the Evolution of Mammals

The discovery of the earliest synapsid cloaca provides much more than an anatomical curiosity. It offers scientists a rare opportunity to investigate the evolution of reproductive and excretory systems in one of the most important vertebrate lineages. As new discoveries emerge from the Bromacker site and other fossil localities, researchers will continue to refine our understanding of how the ancestors of mammals adapted to life on land hundreds of millions of years ago.

Commenting on the importance of this research, Mike from Everything Dinosaur stated:

“Soft tissue fossils are incredibly rare, so discoveries like this earliest synapsid cloaca impression are exceptionally important. The specimen shows that trace fossils can preserve anatomical details that skeletal remains alone cannot reveal. It also reminds us that remarkable scientific discoveries can still be made by re-examining specimens already held in museum collections.”

This remarkable discovery demonstrates how exceptional fossil preservation continues to reveal new chapters in the evolutionary history of the Mammalia.

Everything Dinosaur acknowledges the assistance of a media release from the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin in the compilation of this article.

The scientific paper: “The evolutionary significance of the earliest cloacal opening in Synapsida” by Lorenzo Marchetti, Antoine Logghe, Arnaud Rebillard, Mark J. MacDougall and Jörg Fröbisch published in IScience.

The multi-award-winning Everything Dinosaur website: Models of Prehistoric Life.