All about dinosaurs, fossils and prehistoric animals by Everything Dinosaur team members.
12 10, 2012

Russian Scientists Begin Study of Mammoth Remains

By |2023-02-06T11:38:54+00:00October 12th, 2012|Dinosaur and Prehistoric Animal News Stories|0 Comments

“Mammoth of the Century” in Moscow for Study

The fossilised remains of a teenage Woolly Mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius) has begun to be examined by Moscow-based scientists after it was transported from the remote Siberian location where the fossilised carcase was discovered.  The late Summer months of August and early September are when a number of Woolly Mammoth and other Ice Age fossils are found in the northernmost parts of Russia.  The spring and summer rains coupled with the seasonally high temperatures permit parts of the permafrost to be thawed out or washed away by the erosion of river banks and this can expose the preserved remains of a number of long-dead prehistoric animals.

Woolly Mammoth Fossil

Some of the Woolly Mammoths have soft tissue preserved and with the publishing of the recent, controversial research into the half-life of DNA, talk inevitably turns to the possibility of obtaining genetic material from these extinct animals with the long-term aim of producing clones and resurrecting a species.

The Mammuthus genus (Mammoths) were members of the Elephantidae sub-family, taxonomically classified with extant elephants.  They were highly successful herbivores that lived across northern latitudes (Asia, Europe and North America) as well as Africa.  A number of species have been identified including the famous Woolly Mammoth (M. primigenius) and the larger species, associated with milder climates, the Columbian Mammoth (M. columbi).

The latest Woolly Mammoth fossil to emerge from the permafrost of northern Siberia was found by a young boy called Yevgeny Salinder, whilst he was walking along the banks of the Yenisei river about six weeks ago.  Mammoth fossils including tusks had been found in this area before, but it was not the sight of an over-sized, curved tusk that indicated to Yevgeny that he had found the remains of a Woolly Mammoth, but rather the smell the carcase gave off.  As the long-dead animal’s corpse is exposed to the air with the erosion of the matrix in which the fossil was buried, so the flesh begins to decompose once again.  It was the smell of putrefying flesh that alerted eleven-year old Yevgeny that a Mammoth’s body was lying nearby.

Models of Woolly Mammoths (CollectA Age of Dinosaurs Popular Models and Deluxe)

CollectA Woolly Mammoth models.

The CollectA Deluxe Woolly Mammoth model in 1:20 scale and the CollectA Prehistoric Life Woolly Mammoth calf. Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur.

Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur

To view models and figures of Woolly Mammoths and other extinct animals: CollectA Deluxe – Figures and Models (Prehistoric Animals).

Exposing the Carcase

The back quarters and the legs were the parts of the carcase first exposed, local officials were contacted and the International Mammoth Committee alerted so that an excavation could begin to remove the Woolly Mammoth.  Scientists rushed out to the remote location and began the work of digging out the Mammoth remains.  Alexei Tikhonov, of the St. Petersburg-based Zoological Museum, and an expert of Siberian Mammoths was one of the scientists dispatched to excavate the carcase.  He has described this particular specimen as the best preserved and most complete Mammoth found in Russia for more than 100 years.

Nicknamed the “Mammoth of the Century”, the specimen is that of a teenage Woolly Mammoth, a male that died around 30,000 years ago.  Although the elephant’s trunk has rotted away, scientists have found samples of fur intact and one 1.5 metre long tusk, along with the remains of an eye and a small, Mammoth ear.  Mammoths had much smaller ear flaps than their modern elephant counterparts.  Small ears would not have lost as much heat as a large ear flap and there was no need for large ears to help cool the animal down, temperatures in this part of the world during the Pleistocene Epoch when this animal lived, would have rarely climbed into double figures (Celsius).

With the aid of local volunteers the Mammoth fossil was carefully excavated out of its Siberian grave, the process taking more than a week to complete.  Once the remains had been stabilised (kept at a constant, low temperature to preserve soft tissue), the fossil has been transported back to Moscow for detailed study.  Parts of the specimen will also be examined by Russian palaeontologists in St. Petersburg.

Preserving an Ancient Elephant

Weighing over 1,000 kilogrammes; the carefully packed and preserved ancient elephant may provide researchers with Mammoth DNA.  Viable genetic material could still be preserved deep in the large teeth of the animal or within the larger limb bones such as the femur.  With a team of international scientists recently concluding that DNA might be able to survive for much longer than previously thought in the fossil record (based on evidence from New Zealand Moa fossils), there is a strong possibility that this 30,000 year old carcase might yield genetic material.

To read an article on the research into a DNA half-life: Research into the Half-life of DNA.

Russian scientists are keen to start work, although they will have to be properly protected and wear face masks to ensure exposure to ancient bacteria and other pathogens does not occur.  They will also be keen to avoid any potential DNA contamination.  The skeleton is virtually intact and the body cavity has not been punctured which may have permitted the gut and the other internal organs such as the heart to be preserved.

Like many Woolly Mammoth fossil finds, this teenage Mammoth that was probably around sixteen years of age when it died, has been given a name as well as a formal scientific classification code.  The Mammoth has been named Zhenya, a pet name used by the friends and family of Yevgeny, the boy who sniffed out the fossil discovery in the first place.

11 10, 2012

Update on New Papo Brachiosaurus Model

By |2023-02-06T11:27:41+00:00October 11th, 2012|Adobe CS5, Dinosaur Fans, Press Releases|0 Comments

Latest News on the Brachiosaurus from Papo of France

Sources close to Everything Dinosaur have reported that the first stocks of the new Papo Brachiosaurus model are currently being painted in the factory before being shipped out to Papo’s European distribution hub (France).  Shipments are expected to be arriving in France by the end of the 19th October.

Papo Brachiosaurus Model

A spokesperson from Everything Dinosaur (UK retailer of dinosaur models), commented that if this schedule was followed then this new model should be available from the company a few days after the stock had been sorted and allocated in France.

Papo Brachiosaurus Ready for Loading (artists impression)

Papo Brachiosaurus ready for shipping (nearly).

Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur

The spokesperson also confirmed that space had been made available in the Everything Dinosaur warehouse to accommodate this new model’s arrival.  Plans are in place to email all the customers who had requested that a Brachiosaurus be reserved for them, team members already having been assigned to the task of  managing the reserved models list and contacting customers.

Fingers crossed that everything goes OK with this last Papo release in 2012.

To view the range of Papo dinosaur models and prehistoric animal figures in stock at Everything Dinosaur’s user-friendly and award-winning website: Papo Prehistoric Animal Figures and Dinosaur Models.

10 10, 2012

New Research into Calculating the Half-Life of DNA

By |2024-02-25T07:40:08+00:00October 10th, 2012|Key Stage 3/4|Comments Off on New Research into Calculating the Half-Life of DNA

Extinct Bird Enables Scientists to Propose the Half-Life of DNA

The giant Moa, an extinct type of flightless bird that once roamed the forests and plains of New Zealand is helping scientists to calculate the half-life of DNA.  A team of international researchers have analysed the fossilised bones of three species of these ancient birds and this study suggests that the DNA double helix can persist in the fossil record for a lot longer than previously thought.

The Half-life of DNA

The research, which has been challenged by a number of leading academics and geneticists proposes that under optimum conditions, genetic material relating to organisms can survive in the fossil record for a lot longer than previously thought.  Based on the calculations presented by this team, traces of genetic material might still be detectable in fossils that are around 6.8 million years old.

What is DNA?

DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid) is a complex molecule that encodes the genetic information used in the development, maintenance and functioning of virtually all known living organisms*.  The DNA is located in the chromosomes, these in turn, are found in the nucleus of most cells.

* Many types of viruses, microscopic biological agents that reproduce inside the cells of living hosts do not have DNA.  Instead, these viruses contain a closely related complex molecule called RNA (ribonucleic acid).  It is the RNA that contains the genetic material.  RNA and DNA are different in a number of subtle ways.  For example, RNA is formed by a single strand, whilst DNA is shaped as a double helix.

Why is this Study Controversial?

This study suggests that fragments of genetic material could persist for many millions of years longer than previously thought.  Up until very recently, scientists thought that it was virtually impossible for any delicate, organic structures like the phosphates, sugars and proteins that make up DNA to survive for anything more than a few tens of thousands of years.  Once an organism dies, the body decomposes and is broken down by other organisms and physical/chemical processes.  Minute portions of DNA have been recovered from the frozen flesh of Woolly Mammoths (M. primigenius), but the double helix representing the DNA has been degraded into extremely short fragments.

For models and replicas of extinct prehistoric creatures: Replicas of Extinct Animals (Mojo Fun Models).

The term half-life refers to a measurement that records the time elapsed for a substance to fall to half its measured value.  This term is commonly used in physics and chemistry in the measurement of radioactive decay. The scientist in the Moa study have calculated the half-life of DNA, if this measuring technique is validated by other researchers repeating the experiments and achieving the same results, then the dating of fossils could become much easier and the search for viable genetic material in fossils intensified.

To read a more complete article on this research: Controversial Research Leads to a Re-Think over DNA Preserved in Fossils.

10 10, 2012

Controversial Research Proposes a Half-Life for DNA

By |2023-02-06T08:44:28+00:00October 10th, 2012|Dinosaur and Prehistoric Animal News Stories, Palaeontological articles|0 Comments

Scientists Calculate the Half-Life of DNA using Moa Fossils

A team of international researchers have used the fossilised bones of three species of extinct giant birds from New Zealand to calculate the half-life of DNA.  This study suggests that the double helix can persist in the fossil record under optimum conditions for a lot longer than previously thought with traces of genetic material being detectable in fossils as old as 6.8 million years.  The work, which is controversial, if proved valid, rules out DNA from a dinosaur surviving so there would be no chance of cloning a member of the Dinosauria from genetic material recovered from their bones or from biting insects trapped in amber.

Sorry Michael Crichton fans, but his wonderful idea about a dinosaur populated “Jurassic Park” is simply not on.

A half-life measurement records the time required for a substance to fall to half its measured value at the beginning of a time period.  One of this term’s most common applications is in the measurement of radioactive decay.  Within palaeontology for example, once a half-life of a substance such as elements from an igneous rock deposited in association with sedimentary strata is calculated, since the rate of decay is exponential, this methodology can permit scientists to accurately date rocks and potentially any fossil material associated with adjacent strata.  However, a team of scientists have worked out a half-life for DNA itself.  If this measuring technique proves valid then the dating of fossils could become a lot easier and the search for DNA samples within the fossil record can become more targeted.

Half-life of DNA

There have been a number of papers published recently that claim to have isolated extremely old, fragmentary DNA, even elements of organic material from dinosaur bones.  The need for a reliable model for DNA degradation over the passage of time has been well established.  The international team of palaeontologists took core samples from the leg bones of 158 specimens of New Zealand Moas which were very likely to have preserved in them mitochondrial DNA.  Radiocarbon dating allowed the team to accurate work out the ages of the fossil material and based on this analysis they were able to demonstrate that DNA decays at a exponential rate over time.  The half life of DNA was calculated to be 521 years, much longer than had been demonstrated in other experiments.

Fossilised Leg Bones Used in the Study

Large Moa bones used in the DNA study.

Picture credit: Morten Allentoft

After an animal dies, the cells begin to degrade.  Enzymes start to dissolve the bonds between the nucleotides that form the structure of the DNA material contained within the cell.  Micro-organisms can speed up the decay process, but it is thought that the presence of ground water and the chemical reactions brought about by its presence, is mostly responsible for the degradation of the genetic material.  As groundwater is abundant and found in most strata, so DNA buried in bone undergoing a fossilisation process should, in theory at least, degrade at a set, measurable rate.

The Rate of DNA Decay

Calculating the rate of DNA decay has been fraught with difficulties because of the problems of finding enough fossil material with large amounts of DNA with which to use in any scientific study.  Compounding this problem is the fact that variable environmental conditions such as temperature, the amount of oxygen present and the level of microbial activity all have a significant impact on the decay of organic material.

The research team led by Morten Allentoft (University of Cophenhagen, Denmark) and Michael Bunce (Murdoch University, Perth, Australia) focused their efforts on analysing the DNA from 158 leg bones that belonged to three species of extinct Moa.  Moas were giant, flightless birds (nine species) that were native to New Zealand (Dinornithiformes), some species were over 3.5 metres tall.  These birds, closely related to Australian Emus, became extinct around 1400 AD.  These creatures were once abundant on both North and South Island and the bones used in the study came from three locations all within a few miles of each other.  The close proximity of the specimens studied enabled the scientists to nullify the effect of environmental differences between locations as the fossils had been forming in almost identical preservation conditions.

All the bones have been dated between 8,000 and 600 years old, the strata in which they were being preserved had a temperature of around thirteen degrees Celsius, helping to keep the results of any DNA half-life measurement consistent over the entire sample.

By comparing the specimens’ ages and degrees of DNA degradation, the researchers calculated that DNA has a half-life of 521 years. That means that after 521 years, half of the bonds between nucleotides in the DNA would have broken; after another 521 years half of the remaining bonds would have degraded leaving only a quarter of the original material left; and so on.   Using their research, the team have postulated that detectable DNA could be found in fossils as old as 6.8 million years, but this material would be too fragmented to be used in any cloning work.  DNA’s ability to survive in the fossil record, or so it seems, has been seriously underestimated.

Post doctoral researcher, Morten Allentoft commented:

“DNA degrades at a certain rate, and it therefore makes sense to talk about a half-life.”

These results may provide a baseline for predicting long-term DNA survival in fossil bone, helping palaeontologists to assess the most likely fossils to have sustainable amounts of DNA within them.  In sub-zero conditions, such as those found in Siberia, DNA may have a half-life that it much longer, perhaps as much as 158,000 years.  This would potentially permit scientists to extract viable DNA from Ice Age mammals such as Woolly Rhinos and Mammoths.

A number of scientists have yet to be convinced by these findings.  Eva-Maria Geigl at the Jacques Monod Institute (Paris, France), remains sceptical.  She is concerned that the analysis rests on statistically weak evidence, pointing out that the correlation relies heavily on the Moa bones older than 6000 years – when fewer than 10 of the 158 bones are actually as old as this.

Michael Bunce defended his work by explaining:

“Old fossils are rare and hence there will be less data in this part of the analysis.  There is nothing we can do about it other than present what we have at hand – and clearly, the signal is present.  The correlation is highly significant.”

If genetic material has a predictable time-frame for decay, then palaeontologists may have an opportunity to obtain DNA from important fossil discoveries that reveal life on Earth in the relatively recent geological past.

Ever since the Indonesian island of Flores yielded remains of a pygmy-like hominid (Homo floresiensis), nick-named the “hobbit” speculation has been rife that some specimens might contain DNA that would help pin down its position in the human family tree.   Scientist remain uncertain whether these little people were descendants from modern humans or the much older H. erectus.

Unfortunately, exogenous factors would “cloud” the DNA half-life calculations.  The conditions in which the fossils were preserved, the degree of groundwater, the amount of oxygen, the level of microbial activity  and the ground temperature would all affect the rate of genetic decomposition.  The research scientists conclude that “a host of other factors would come into play“, including the time of year when the organism died.  Although the Moa bones used in the study had all been retrieved from very similar environments, the age of the specimens could only account for about 40% of the variation in DNA preservation.  The research team admits that the “half-life signal is very noisy“.

How a corpse rots and a whole host of other factors would influence the rate of decline of any genetic material once present, based on this work retrievable and workable DNA could potentially be recovered from a fossil that was 1.8 million years old – but beyond this time-frame sufficient DNA recovery to permit effective study would be virtually impossible.

Looks like the non-avian dinosaurs are really extinct after all.

For models and replicas of prehistoric animals and ancient creatures: Prehistoric Animal Models (Mojo Fun).

9 10, 2012

100-million-year-old Spider Preserved In Amber as it Approached its Victim

By |2023-03-07T10:16:39+00:00October 9th, 2012|Dinosaur and Prehistoric Animal News Stories|0 Comments

Spider Attack Preserved in Amber

Researchers from Oregon State University (College of Science) have discovered a remarkable, 100-million-year-old spider fossil showing the moment when an orb spider approached its victim ensnared in its web.  The fossil consists of the remains of the spider and a parasitic wasp, preserved in amber just as the spider was about to pounce upon the insect, as it was held fast by the silken threads of the spider’s web.  Amber is the hardened remains of sticky, often scented resin that is produced by certain types of trees as protection against damage to bark and in order to help protect against disease and fungal attacks.  Insects and other organisms can become trapped in the sticky resin as it flows down the trunk or branches and when fossilised and preserved as amber, these organic remains can be studied by scientists.

Trees first evolved the ability to produce resin of this nature in the Jurassic, but this piece of amber, discovered in the Hukawng Valley (also known as the Hukaung Valley), in northern Burma dates from the later Cretaceous geological period.

100-million-year-old Spider Fossil

The Hukaung Valley has been mined for amber and gold for many years, it has already produced a number of amber fossils containing insect remains.   About ten years ago, the fossilised remains of the world’s oldest bee was discovered in an amber nodule from a mine in the Hukaung Valley.  However, this is the first discovery of a predator/prey interaction concerning a spider and an insect trapped in a web.  The amber nodule containing the fossilised remains has been dated to approximately 97-100 million years ago (Albian faunal stage of the Cretaceous) – a time when the dinosaurs ruled the Earth.

In addition to the first spider, the silk and the remains of the spider’s attempted meal, the wasp, the amber nodule also contained the remains of a second male spider.  Scientists at the Oregon State University have interpreted this as evidence of social behaviour amongst arachnids.  Most extant species of spider are solitary hunters, often they are cannibalistic towards their own kind, mature males and females will attack immature members of their own species.  A number of species today show signs of social behaviour, living in colonies or aggregations.

The Oregon based team postulate that this fossil is evidence of such social, colonial activity in spiders back in the Cretaceous, the first evidence found of tolerance of other members of their own species by a spider.

The Spider About to Attack the Parasitic Wasp

100-million-year-old spider fossil

100-million-year-old spider and wasp fossil.

Picture credit: Oregon State University.

Professor Emeritus of Zoology at Oregon State University, George Poiner Junior, a recognised authority on invertebrate fossils stated that:

“This juvenile spider was going to make a meal out of a tiny parasitic wasp, but never quite got to it.  This was a male wasp that suddenly found itself trapped in a spider web.  This was the wasp’s worst nightmare, and it never ended. The wasp was watching the spider just as it was about to be attacked, when tree resin flowed over and captured both of them.”

Over recent years, palaeontologists have discovered some amazing fossil specimens preserved in amber, from ancient Arthropods, to numerous types of insect, pollen, plant debris, even a frog, hairs from mammal and feathers from either an ancient bird or a dinosaur.  Such fossils provide an insight into deep time, a micro world which helps scientists to understand more about ecosystems and habitats.

To read about the discovery of ancient spider silk: World’s Oldest Spiders Web Discovered Entombed in Amber.

To read an article about feathers preserved in amber: Canadian Palaeontologists in a Flap over Feathers.

The wasp has been identified as an ancestor of today’s parasitic wasps that attack and disable spiders and insects and lay their own eggs into the paralysed body of their victim or instead, parasitise the eggs of such creatures.  The kind of spider preserved in the amber, a relative of today’s tropical orb spiders, but a member of an extinct genus would probably have been the sort of creature the wasp would have liked to attack.

As the research team members have stated in their press conferences, this fossil preserves the moment when a spider was able to turn the tables on a parasitic wasp.  There were at least fifteen silken threads preserved in the amber nodule, evidence of the spider’s web.  Some of these threads had trapped the wasp.

Both the spider and the wasp are scientifically described in an academic paper published in the journal “Historical Biology”.

For models and replicas of ancient invertebrates: CollectA Age of Dinosaurs Models (Popular).

8 10, 2012

The Great Book of Dinosaurs Reviewed

By |2023-02-06T08:33:37+00:00October 8th, 2012|Book Reviews, Product Reviews|3 Comments

A Review of the “Great Book of Dinosaurs”

Young dinosaur fans aged from five years and upwards will enjoy this fact-filled, hardback dinosaur book entitled the “Great Book of Dinosaurs”, which contains over two hundred illustrations.  Written in a nice, big font, this colourful dinosaur and prehistoric animal book will help encourage young readers, the 124 pages are well-laid out and the text consists of lots of short, clear paragraphs aimed at encouraging young people with their reading skills.

The Front Cover of the “Great Book of Dinosaurs”

Aimed at young readers.

Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur

“Great Book of Dinosaurs”

The contents are set out in six chapters, the first of which introduces the dinosaurs and explains how these reptiles first evolved.  There is also a comprehensive “family tree” that shows the taxonomic relationships between the various different types of creatures that make up the Dinosauria.  Despite the book’s title, flying reptiles (pterosaurs) are extensively covered as well as dinosaurs and there is a handy timeline that explains how the main types of pterosaur evolved and when they lived.  The second chapter covers the evolution of the sauropods, dinosaurs such as Apatosaurus, Camarasaurus and Brachiosaurus.  Other chapters are entitled “Fearsome Hunters”, “Armoured Plant-eaters” and “Two-Legged Runners”.  The pterosaurs are covered in a chapter towards the end of this book in a section called “Monster Fliers”.

More than two hundred well-crafted illustrations really bring the Mesozoic Era to life and there is lots of information about dinosaur discoveries and palaeontology.  Diagrams of skeletons highlight the main differences between the major groups of dinosaurs and there is a handy “How do I say that” section which spells the names of these prehistoric creatures phonetically, thus helping with pronunciation.  This guide will prove especially helpful to those parents, grandparents and guardians who read this book with their young charges.

An Informative and Enjoyable Read

Packed full of facts and figures.

Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur

Unique Fact File Layout

The best-known dinosaurs are given a unique fact file that explains when these animals lived, how big they were and what  they ate.  For those readers who want to use this as a reference book, there is a clearly laid out index at the back.  The pterosaurs are certainly featured and there is plenty of information on different types of flying reptile, creatures such as the spectacular Phobetor, Pteranodon and perhaps the largest pterosaur of all – Quetzalcoatlus.

Key words and phrases are explained very well using simple language and this hardback will prove to be very popular with children.  It was pleasing to see that maps had been included which show where the fossils of certain dinosaurs were found.  There is even a double page spread that displays a pair of tyrannosaurs feeding – T. rex illustrated in glorious, gory colour.

To view Everything Dinosaur’s range of dinosaur models and gifts: Everything Dinosaur.

A well-written and cleverly illustrated dinosaur book that helps readers learn about the lives of some of the biggest and fiercest creatures known to science.

7 10, 2012

Announcing New CollectA Models for 2013

By |2023-02-06T08:30:23+00:00October 7th, 2012|Dinosaur Fans, Press Releases|5 Comments

Collecta Announces New Additions to their Prehistoric Animal Replica Range

New CollectA models for 2013:

Diabloceratops (racing with Safari Ltd to launch this horned dinosaur), Daspletosaurus (super tyrannosaurid), Diplodocus and Pachycephalosaurus.

New CollectA Models

In the Deluxe scale series: Parasaurolophus and a repaint of the Ankylosaurus armoured dinosaur model.

The Deinotherium (prehistoric elephant) will be available next year too.

A spokesperson from the award-winning Everything Dinosaur commented that team members would soon begin to prepare prehistoric animal fact sheets that will be sent out with future sales of these models and figures.

The New for 2013 CollectA Deluxe 1:40 Scale Parasaurolophus Dinosaur Model

CollectA Dinosaur Models (Parasaurolophus).

Colourful and well made dinosaur model. The new for 2013 CollectA Deluxe Parasaurolophus dinosaur model.

To view Everything Dinosaur’s current range of CollectA prehistoric animal figures including dinosaurs, pterosaurs, prehistoric mammals and not-to-scale replicas of marine reptiles: CollectA Prehistoric Life Figures.

7 10, 2012

Late Jurassic Marine Crocodiles – More Like Killer Whales than Crocs.

By |2023-02-06T08:23:43+00:00October 7th, 2012|Dinosaur and Prehistoric Animal News Stories, Palaeontological articles|0 Comments

Research Suggests Marine Crocodiles Were Very Different from Todays

Scientists at the University of Edinburgh have concluded that Late Jurassic marine crocodiles may have fed more like Killer Whales than extant crocodiles and one genus could have sucked prey into its mouth or simply attacked and torn other large marine creatures apart with its strong jaws and teeth.

Marine Crocodile Research

Marine crocodiles (crocodylomorphs) represent a branch of the crocodile family tree that radiated out from land base forms during the Mesozoic and evolved into a variety of families and genera.  There is an extensive fossil record with numerous skulls and other fossilised bones as well a large numbers of individual teeth for palaeontologists to study.

Marine crocodiles shared similar characteristics, unlike their land-based ancestors these reptiles adapted to a nektonic (actively swimming) life by slowly losing their body armour (scutes/osteoderms) and becoming more streamlined.  Their limbs evolved into paddles and most species had broad tails which ended in a hypocercal tail fin.  A hypocercal tail fin is a fin which is not symmetrical along the horizontal axis in line with the caudal vertebrae (in the case of vertebrates).  The lower tail lobe is enlarged and bigger than the upper tail lobe.  It is very likely that these crocodiles propelled themselves through the water in the same way that crocodiles do today.  The tail was the source of propulsion, the limbs (paddles) may have been used to make changes in direction and small adjustments in the water column.   However, these evolutionary adaptations made these creatures much more efficient swimmers than land based crocodylomorphs.

An Illustration of a Typical Marine Crocodile

Marine crocodile model Dakosaurus.

A close-up view of the head of the PNSO marine crocodile model Dakosaurus.

The picture (above) shows the package art for the PNSO Dakosaurus replica.

To view the PNSO range of prehistoric animals including marine reptiles: PNSO Marine Crocodiles and Prehistoric Animal Models.

One super-family of the marine crocodiles, the Metriorhynchidae seems to have had a particularly large geographical distribution, with fossils being found in England, France, Switzerland, Italy and Germany as well as the Americas including Chile and Argentina.  As a group, these carnivorous reptiles seemed to have their heyday in the Late Jurassic but fewer fossils have been found in Lower Cretaceous strata.  The research team, led by Dr Mark Young of the School of Geosciences (University of Edinburgh) studied two types of marine crocodile Dakosaurus and the larger Plesiosuchus.  They have concluded that these large, contemporaneous predators probably predated on different types of prey.

To read about the discovery of Jurassic crocodile fossils in Switzerland: Marine Crocodile Fossils Found in the Land of Chocolate, Pen Knives and Cuckoo Clocks.

Dakosaurus

Dakosaurus spp. grew to lengths approaching five metres, they were not the largest types of marine crocodile but they did have the most robust lower jaws and in proportion to their body size, much larger teeth.  The teeth of Dakosaurus spp were designed for slicing, the Edinburgh researchers conclude that this type of marine crocodile evolved a specialism for tackling large prey.  The teeth and strong jaws being capable of dismembering large-bodied prey and crushing bones.  In addition, the research team have concluded that one species of Dakosaurus (Dakosaurus maximus) may have been capable of creating a pressure differential inside its strong jaws that permitted it to suck in prey.  Many of the teeth found in the fossilised jaws of Dakosaurus are broken and show extensive wear.  The scientists have concluded that these pathologies are indicative of the tougher, larger body parts that these animals were consuming.  Teeth may also have been broken as these crocodylomorphs tore their victims apart.

The Lower Jaw of a Dakosaurus (Dakosaurus maximus)

Robust and powerful jaws and teeth.

Picture credit: PLoS One

The Plesiosuchus genera also had strong jaws, large fenestrae  (openings in the skull) would have anchored strong muscles to give these crocodiles a powerful bite.  They could also gape their jaws very wide enabling them to tackle large prey items, but probably animals no bigger than their mouths could gape.  The teeth of Plesiosuchus spp. are proportionally smaller and more conical than the teeth of Dakosaurus.  Fossilised teeth ascribed to Plesiosuchus lack the crown breakage seen with Dakosaurus teeth.  This suggests that Plesiosuchus did not eat the same animals as the smaller Dakosaurus.  They may have killed their victims with a single bite before swallowing their meal whole.

The relationship between Dakosaurus and Plesiosuchus is very similar to that seen with North Atlantic Killer Whales today.  There is a larger type of Killer Whale that lacks broken teeth, whilst there is a smaller type of Killer Whale that tends to have extensive crown breakage.  Marine biologists have proposed that these differences in teeth wear are associated with diet.  Each type of Killer Whale specialising in different types of prey.  Plesiosuchus may have been a specialist piscivore (fish-eater) tackling prey no more than a metre in length perhaps, whereas Dakosaurus may have hunted ichthyosaurs, other marine reptiles and larger types of fish.

Size Comparisons between Different Types of Marine Crocodile

Frogman in picture is 1.8 metres tall.

Picture credit: PLoS One

Different Types of Feeding Behaviour

The research team have concluded that this different feeding behaviour helps to explain why so many apex predators were able to live together in the Late Jurassic marine environments.

Commenting on the research, one of the authors of the scientific paper that has been published on this subject, Dr Lorna Steel stated:

“The skull and tooth morphology show that they all ate different prey, and fed in different ways.”

6 10, 2012

Hadrosaurs – Tough Teeth for Top Chewing

By |2023-02-06T08:15:58+00:00October 6th, 2012|Dinosaur and Prehistoric Animal News Stories|0 Comments

Research into Hadrosaur Dentition Provides Clue to the Group’s Success

One of the most successful groups of large, land animals known to science are the Hadrosauridae, a group of ornithischian (bird-hipped), plant-eating dinosaurs that evolved from the iguanodontids during the Cretaceous geological period.  These animals evolved into many families and genera, some species grew up to twelve metres in length or more and they dominated terrestrial ecosystems across the Northern Hemisphere up until the demise of the Dinosauria 66 million years ago.  A new study examining the dentition of hadrosaurs, suggests their teeth were one of the reasons for their evolutionary success.

Dentition of Hadrosaurs

This type of dinosaur, commonly called “duck-billed” dinosaurs as they all had horny beaks is classified into two major taxons – the Lambeosaurinae and the Hadrosaurinae.  Lambeosaurs, dinosaurs such as Parasaurolophus, Corythosaurus and Olorotitan had hollow, ornate head crests.  The Hadrosaurinae, animals such as Gryposaurus, Maiasaura and Edmontosaurus lacked the often flamboyant crest.  Instead, these dinosaurs had flat, crestless heads or their snouts were ornamented with bony lumps or solid crests.

Taxonomic Relationships in the Hadrosauridae

Diversifying ornithischian dinosaurs.

Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur

Differences Between the Clades

There are other differences between these two clades of dinosaurs.  For example, the Hadrosaurinae generally had broader jaws and wider beaks than their Lambeosaurinae cousins.  This suggests different feeding habits with the narrow-beaked lambeosaurs being more selective feeders.  Both types of hadrosaur had many hundreds of closely packed, diamond shaped teeth in their jaws, some specimens had over 1,400 individual teeth in their mouths.  These teeth formed a “dental battery”, interlocked teeth to form a very efficient grinding surface to help these animals tackle tough plant material.  The upper and lower tooth batteries were angled so that when the mouth was closed the teeth formed a natural grinding surface.   For many years palaeontologists had known that these animals were very efficient processors of plant food, perhaps a clue to this groups’s success but new research proposes that the structure of the teeth themselves made these dinosaurs much more effective consumers of plants than most of today’s grazers.

To view models and replicas of hadrosaurs (lambeosaurines and Saurolophinae): Ornithischian Dinosaur Models (Safari Ltd).

Super Efficient Plant-Eaters

A typical crested hadrosaur (Lambeosaurinae).

Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur

A team of American scientists led by biologist Gregory Erickson of Florida State University (Tallahassee), have been testing the grinding capabilities of eighty-five-million-year-old duck-billed dinosaur teeth and examining their internal structure.  Their research shows that the hadrosaurs evolved extremely sophisticated teeth, more sophisticated than modern mammalian herbivores such as bison, horses and elephants.

Using teeth supplied by the American Museum of Natural History (New York), the research team created models of the jaws of these types of dinosaurs and subjected the teeth to diamond abrasion to simulate wear on the tooth surface as a result of grinding up plant material.  The teeth were then examined under light and electron microscopes and the degree of wear calculated.

Hadrosaur Dentition

These teeth were made for grinding.

Picture credit: D. Gregory Erickson

The study demonstrates that unlike most mammalian molars and pre-molars which are composed of four major tissues that wear at different rates, creating coarse, roughened surfaces to help break down tough plants, the duck-bills evolved a six tissue dental composition which improved the teeth’s ability to grind up food.

Tough, strong teeth designed to tackle plants has evolved repeatedly in the ungulates and other mammal groups.  However, a similar innovation in dental complexity occurred much earlier in the history of life on Earth, with the hadrosaurs.  Most reptilian teeth are not as complex, it seems that as the iguanodontids gave rise to the hadrosaurs so the teeth of these animals evolved into extremely efficient grinders.  The external layer of enamel being supported by layers of other tissue such as dentine.  Importantly, the researchers also discovered that the way tissues were distributed varied substantially within each individual tooth.   Each tooth in the dental battery would assume a different function as the morphology and the grinding surface of the tooth changed as it became worn.   Different surfaces would be exposed as the teeth migrated across the grinding and chewing surface of the jaw, before eventually falling out to be replaced with new teeth that emerged from the jawline.

The morphology and structure of the teeth would have enabled these herbivores to grind up tough plants such as horsetails, ferns, conifer needles and the newly evolved flowering plants.  Most reptiles have much more simple teeth structures and the scientists are not sure how such dentition evolved.  The lack of transitional fossils between iguanodontids and hadrosaurs is hindering the team’s progress as they search for answers in the fossil record.

Referring to hadrosaurs as “walking pulp mills“, Gregory Erickson and his research colleagues have declared the duck-billed teeth lined jaws as one of the most sophisticated grazing and grinding mechanisms ever to evolve in terrestrial mega herbivores.  Their teeth are more complex and better adapted to grinding than most of the large plant-eating mammals found today.

5 10, 2012

A Review of the Carnegie Collectibles Saltasaurus

By |2023-02-06T08:08:42+00:00October 5th, 2012|Dinosaur Fans, Everything Dinosaur Products, Product Reviews|0 Comments

Saltasaurus Dinosaur Model Reviewed

It is always intriguing to see how model manufacturers interpret fossil evidence of long-necked dinosaurs, especially the titanosaurs as there is considerable debate regarding how these huge herbivores looked.  For example, many of these quadrupeds may have been covered in armour, but to what degree is a hot topic amongst palaeontologists.  Safari Ltd, the American replica and figure manufacturer have created a number of replicas of long-necked dinosaurs and the titanosaurs are represented by a 1:35 scale model of the South American dinosaur known as Saltasaurus (Saltasaurus loricatus).

Saltasaurus Dinosaur Model

The Carnegie Collectibles Saltasaurus Dinosaur Model

“Reptile from Salta Province”.

Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur

Saltasaurus fossils, the name means reptile from Salta Province (Argentina), were first unearthed in the early part of the 20th Century.  A number of bony plates and scales were discovered and these were thought to be the armour plating on an ankylosaur-like, armoured dinosaur.  However, it is now known that these bony plates, known as scutes were actually from an armoured, long-necked dinosaur.  In the late 1970s, six partial skeletons were excavated and it was confirmed that the fossil remains represented a large, long necked dinosaur that had body armour.  titanosaurs are regarded as advanced members of the Sauropoda clade of dinosaurs.  Titanosaurs such as Saltasaurus are distinguished from the likes of the Jurassic Apatosaurus and Diplodocus by having extensive body armour, a much reduced or no thumb claw and proportionately wider hips.

Described in 1980

Described in 1980 by the Argentinian palaeontologist José Bonaparte and his colleague Jaime Powell, Saltasaurus was a relatively small, plant-eating dinosaur of the Late Cretaceous.  It gets its name from a region in north-western Argentina, where fossils of this animal had been found.  Measuring around twelve metres in length and weighing something like eight metric tonnes, this dinosaur was not as big as other South American titanosaurs that lived in the Early Cretaceous.

The Carnegie Collectibles Saltasaurus shows the dermal armour that this dinosaur had to good effect.  The back and the flanks are covered with large, round bumps that give the impression of body armour, the skin texture has a roughened appearance and individual scales can be made out on the model.  This dinosaur is posed with its left front foot and its left hind foot just touching the ground as if this animal is moving relatively quickly.  Fossilised dinosaur footprints found in Salta Province which have been ascribed to Saltasaurus, show that this animal may have lived in herds and would have been able to move more quickly than Jurassic diplodocids, although it was still relatively slow, perhaps moving at a maximum speed of eight kilometres per hour.

To view Everything Dinosaur’s range of Carnegie Collectibles and other dinosaur models: Wild Safari Dinosaur and Prehistoric Animal Models.

The markings around the eye are quite distinct, a series of black spots under the eye and a grey patch.  Scientists believe that these type of dinosaurs may have had brightly coloured heads which were used to display to other members of the herd. There is also a hint  of a small throat pouch on the model.   The tail is held out behind the animal in a more modern anatomical interpretation of titanosaur posture.

This Saltasaurus model measures twenty-six and a half centimetres in length and based on a size estimate of twelve metres, the scale of the replica is more like 1:45 rather than the stated 1:35.  Nevertheless, this is an excellent titanosaur replica and an interesting member of the Carnegie Collectibles dinosaur model range.

Go to Top