Anglo American Research indicates Neanderthal Technology on a par with H. Sapiens

The popular myth of the slow, sluggish, ape-like Neanderthal being driven to extinction by the superior Homo sapiens is being further challenged by a new study into Neanderthal technology by a team of British and American researchers.

Neanderthal

It is important to note that the Neanderthals were a highly successful human species, physically better adapted to the harsh, cold climate of Europe during the Pleistocene than modern humans.  They were probably capable of complex speech and our view of the culture has been revised with recent fossil finds.

Neanderthals have had a bad press, this is partly due to the inaccurate and flawed interpretation of a nearly complete skeleton found at La Chapelle-aux-Saints, France in 1908.  The skeleton was discovered by monks building a new Abbey and examined by the renowned French scientist M. Boule.  A number of leading academics, including Boule believed that Neanderthals were not closely related to modern humans, the absence of any knowledge about DNA or the true nature of genetics at the time did not help with a resolution to this matter.

This specimen was used to demonstrate the differences between the two species, the Neanderthal, was a stooping, ape-like animal, the stance and posture gave illustrators license to represent Neanderthals as hairy and brutish looking.  The skeleton found at La Chapelle-aux-Saints was of an elderly male with chronic arthritis.  This condition had deformed the bones and this led to the depiction of a slow, clumsy, dim witted Neanderthal.

New Research

Now research by UK and American scientists has struck another blow to the theory that Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis) became extinct because they were less intelligent than our ancestors (Homo sapiens), Neanderthals were very capable and efficient tool makers, at least as good as our own species. The research team has shown that early stone tool technologies developed by us – Homo sapiens, were no more efficient than those used by Neanderthals.

Published in the Journal of Human Evolution, their discovery helps to refute a textbook belief held by archaeologists and anthropologists for more than 60 years.

The team from the University of Exeter, Southern Methodist University, Texas State University, and the Think Computer Corporation, spent three years flintknapping (making stone tools). They knapped stone tools known as ‘flakes,’ which were wider tools originally used by both Neanderthals and by the first modern people, and ‘blades,’ a narrower stone tool later adopted by Homo sapiens. Archaeologists often use the development of stone blades and their assumed efficiency as proof of our superior intelligence. To examine this hypothesis, the scientists analysed a number of tools that were produced, studying how much cutting-edge was created, the efficiency in consuming raw material and how long tools lasted.

Selecting a CollectA Neanderthal man figure for an Everything Dinosaur customer. Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur.

Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur

The model shown above is the CollectA Neanderthal man figure, to view the range of CollectA models: CollectA Prehistoric Animal Models.

It is known that Neanderthals did use stone tools in slightly different was to our own species, for example their grip was much stronger and they were more capable of making powerful scraping strokes on animal hide.  They also may have held animal skins in their teeth (wear marks on enamel my indicate this) and manipulated them this way whilst scraping of the flesh to make hides and to access all the meat on a carcase.

Stone Blades

Stone blades were first produced by Homo sapiens during their colonisation of Europe from Africa approximately 40,000 years ago. This has traditionally been thought to be a dramatic technological advance, helping modern humans out-compete, and eventually oust the Neanderthals.  Yet when the research team analysed their data there was no statistical difference between the efficiency of the two technologies. In fact, their findings showed that in some respects the flakes favoured by Neanderthals were more efficient than the blades adopted by our own species.

Challenging Beliefs

Many long-held beliefs suggesting why the Neanderthals went extinct have been debunked in recent years. Research has already shown that Neanderthals were as good at hunting as Homo sapiens and had no clear disadvantage in their ability to communicate.  Although, they probably did have different hunting strategies and techniques.  Evidence from fossil Neanderthal bones reveal many injuries, the sort of damage that would have occurred if the Neanderthal got up close and personal with his or her quarry.  Their spears were better designed for thrusting rather than throwing so this too indicates that they brought down prey at close quarters.  Now, these latest findings add to the growing evidence that Neanderthals were no less intelligent than our ancestors.

Metin Eren, an MA Experimental Archaeology student at the University of Exeter and lead author on the paper comments:

“our research disputes a major pillar holding up the long-held assumption that Homo sapiens were more advanced than Neanderthals.  It is time for archaeologists to start searching for other reasons why Neanderthals became extinct while our ancestors survived. Technologically speaking, there is no clear advantage of one tool over the other. When we think of Neanderthals, we need to stop thinking in terms of ‘stupid’ or ‘less advanced’ and more in terms of ‘different.'”

Now that it is established that there is no technical advantage to blades, why did Homo sapiens adopt this technology during their colonisation of Europe? The researchers suggest that the reason for this shift may be more cultural or symbolic. Eren states:

“Colonising a continent isn’t easy. Colonising a continent during the Ice Age is even harder. So, for early Homo sapiens colonising Ice Age Europe, a new shared and flashy-looking technology might serve as one form of social glue by which larger social networks were bonded. Thus, during hard times and resource droughts these larger social networks might act like a type of ‘life insurance,’ ensuring exchange and trade among members on the same ‘team.'”

South American Tar Pits may Yield Fossil Treasure Trove

Tar pits are wonderful places to find fossils.  They form when natural asphalt seeps upwards from fissures in the overlying sediment above oil bearing rocks.  This asphalt collects in pools on the surface and rainwater collects on top, forming a thin watery film over the sticky tar.

The water reflects the sky and helps conceal the dangerous tar just below the surface, when thirsty animals come to drink at these “pseudo waterholes” they become stuck fast and mired and if the tar pit does not engulf them straight away the poor, unfortunate animals will starve to death.  Their cries will attract predators and scavengers on the look out for an easy meal and they too will become stuck in the heavy tar.

La Brea Tar Pits

Perhaps the most famous tar pit site in the world is at La Brea, in downtown Los Angeles, California.  The word “Brea” is Spanish for tar.  La Brea has trapped an extraordinary number of Late Pleistocene animals, a surprising number of the area’s victims are carnivores.  Hundreds of Dire Wolves (Canis dirus) and many Sabre-tooth cats (Smilodon sp.) have been trapped and preserved along with numerous smaller predators such as foxes, coyotes, skunks, weasels and even badgers.

When cataloguing the huge number of fossils of meat-eaters it has been noticed by American scientists that many of the carnivores were very young, very old or suffering from injuries.  Among the Sabre-tooth cats for example, a large proportion of the specimens recovered from La Brea show signs of back trouble, with vertebrae of the lower back often fused together.  Whether this is an inherent weakness in the backs of these animals or the result of an injury sustained is unclear.  Perhaps the easy pickings of the tar pits encouraged diseased, injured, elderly or the inexperienced members of an animal population to gather round La Brea.

Perhaps South America will soon have its equivalent of La Brea.  Ancient tar pits have been discovered in Venezuela as the state oil company excavated an oil pipeline in the eastern state of Monagas.  Researchers have claimed that this is the most significant fossil find for 60 years.

Late Pliocene Pits

The prehistoric tar pits have yet to be fully mapped and explored but it is believed that they cover approximately 3 acres in size and date from the Late Pliocene, a time shortly after the continents of North and South America became connected by a land bridge.

The palaeontologists studying the site hope that fossils preserved in the tar pits will give them a better understanding of the interaction between migrating large mammal populations as once isolated ecosystems in North and South America converged and mingled together.

If this new site yields a number of Sabre-tooth specimens this may help the scientists to learn more about the development of the Smilodon genus.

An Illustration of a Sabre-Toothed Cat

Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur

To see a model of a Sabre-Tooth Cat and other prehistoric animals: Prehistoric Animal Models.

Before the land bridge was formed, occasional falls in the Atlantic and Pacific ocean levels may have turned some present-day seabeds into land, allowing animals to migrate across chains of islands in the West Indies and what is now the countries of Panama and Costa Rica.

German Scientists Declare “Sensational” Dinosaur Discovery

The town of Bernburg in the Saxony-Anhalt province of central Germany may be best known for its imposing castle overlooking the river Saale upon which the town is situated but all that may change very soon.  A team of scientists working at a dig site in a quarry near the town have discovered fossilised bones that may prove to be the oldest record of dinosaur life yet found.

Fossil Bones

The fossil bones, a series of fragments have been found in strata dating from the very beginning of the Age of Reptiles, the very start of the Triassic age.  The fossils have been dated to approximately 250 million years ago (Induan faunal stage).  Finding vertebrate fossils in lower Triassic strata is a rare event in itself as the world was just beginning to recover from the mass extinction that marked the end of the Permian period and the start of the Mesozoic era.

Germany was part of eastern Laurentia that itself formed the northern part of the super-continent Pangea.  Much of the landmass was devoid of life and covered with harsh deserts but in areas where rivers drained from inland mountains lush ribbons of life thrived along these natural drainage systems.

Origin of Dinosaurs

If the fossils found at Bernburg are proved to be the ancestors of Dinosauria, something akin to an Archosaur then this puts the evolution of dinosaurs back 15 million years earlier than previously thought.  The exact origins of the dinosaur taxon are unclear, the paucity of the fossil record prevents a complete understanding of the evolution of dinosaurs from “proto-dinosaurs”.  Up until now the oldest dinosaur fossils have been found in Argentina with small, bipedal animals such as Eoraptor lunensis (means “Dawn Thief”) or Staurikosaurus pricei (means “Southern Cross Lizard”) vying for the title of oldest dinosaur known.  These animals date from approximately 230 million  years ago (Ladinian faunal stage) or Mid Triassic.

New Discoveries

But the new discoveries could radically change palaeontology’s understanding of the dawn of the Triassic age, and the evolution of  Dinosauria.

“This is a spectacular, unique achievement,” said regional archaeology chief Harald Meller, announcing the discovery.

He said that the crucial remnants ­had been secured and were being prepared for further research, but the German authorities called on amateur enthusiasts and fossil hunters to stay away from the site, for fear of damaging potential further finds.

It was certainly in the Triassic that the dinosaurs began to emerge as the dominant reptiles on Earth, diversifying rapidly towards the end of this period to form the numerous families that were to dominate life on Earth up until 65 million years ago.  The Triassic period was named by a German geologist, Dr Friedrich August von Alberti in 1834, seven years before the term Dinosauria was coined by Sir Richard Owen.  Dr Alberti studied the different types of fossils to be found in three distinct types of sediments that had been laid down over much of Germany and northern Europe.

This type of formation is called a Trias and Alberti noted that they all formed a sequence of deposition, what is termed today as a system.  It is from this sequence of three types of strata laid down that the Triassic got its name.

To view models of Triassic dinosaurs and other prehistoric creatures: CollectA Prehistoric Life Models and Figures.

Insight into the Late Cretaceous Arctic – Not the place for a Swim

A joint Canadian, Polish and US team of scientists have braved Arctic conditions to research and report upon a 70 million-year-old ecosystem uncovered in the Arctic Circle.  Freshly excavated and mapped fossil bearing sediments in the Canadian province of Nunavut in the far north of Canada have provided an unique insight into the fauna of a Late Cretaceous sea.  A number of new animals have been discovered plus a large amount of plesiosaur material, ancient shark teeth, fossil sponges and even some prehistoric poo (coprolite).

First discovered by geologists surveying the northern tip of Devon island in the 1980s the sediments remained unexplored until the joint Polish, Canadian and American team set out to study this area in more detail.  Their research has revealed that during the Late Cretaceous this area was much warmer than today and supported a rich ecosystem of marine life.

The paper detailing the team’s research has just been published in the Proceedings of the British-based Royal Society.  Approximately 73 million years ago (Campanian faunal stage), this area was covered with a shallow, semi-tropical sea that supported a variety of strange and exotic creatures, including the long-necked, fish eating plesiosaurs.  On the shore there were large conifer forests which would have thrived in the short Arctic summers, with perhaps migrating herds of duck-billed dinosaurs visiting the region to take advantage of the long daylight hours in the spring and summer months.

The Late Cretaceous Arctic

The prehistoric world uncovered by the palaeontologists contrasts with the bleak conditions to be found on Devon Island today.  It is uninhabited (in fact it is probably the largest area of land on Earth not to be permanently inhabited by people).  A few birds are indigenous to the area, and some hardy musk ox scrape out a meagre living grazing on the lower slopes of the island’s uplands.

One of the more exciting finds are the thick bones and armour-like scales of an unidentified type of fish, estimated to have grown to approximately 2 metres in length and a new species of sponge, preserved in three-dimensional perfection. The sponge, Nunavutospongia irregulara, is named for the Canadian territory where it was found and was the subject of a separate paper published earlier in the Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences.

All of the specimens are being held on behalf of the Nunavut government by the Canadian Museum of Nature in Ottawa, where palaeontologist Stephen Cumbaa, a co-author of the study along with other scientists is continuing the research.

Cumbaa said the “mystery fish,” which isn’t likely to have been a major predator, “doesn’t look like anything else that’s been described. We’re still trying to piece it together enough to decide what we’ve got.”

The largest animals living in the area at the time seem to have been the Elasmosauridae (long-necked plesiosaurs).  These fish-eating marine reptiles reached lengths in excess of 15 metres.  As a group they went extinct at the end of the Cretaceous.

An Illustration of a Typical Elasmosaur

Picture credit: Mike Fredericks

To see a model of plesiosaur and other marine reptiles: Marine Reptiles and Prehistoric Animal Models.

Devon Island is also important to geologists and palaeontologists for a number of reasons.  Firstly, it contains a number of important mineral resources and secondly, as it is the site of a remarkably well preserved meteorite impact crater (called the Haughton impact crater).  A large extraterrestrial body crashed into the island approximately 39 million years ago.  During this period the area was still relatively warm compared with today and there were forests covering the island.  However, the cold climate of this region today has helped preserved the impact crater in pristine condition, permitting scientists to study the effect of such impacts in great detail.

The knowledge gained about meteorite impacts in the cold conditions of Devon Island have helped NASA scientists predict the likely conditions to be encountered when probes visit the planet Mars.

Trackway that shows Footprints of Three Types of Dinosaur Discovered

The town of Sparwood lies in the Elk Valley, one of the most rugged and beautiful areas of British Columbia.  It is famous for wildlife and its natural beauty, now some ancient residents of this particular area of Canada are grabbing the headlines.

Dinosaur Footprints

Local coal miners exposed a near vertical slab of rock that contains the trackways of at least three different types of dinosaur.  News of this find reached local palaeontologist, Rich McCrea, the curator of the Peace Region Palaeontology Centre at nearby Tumbler Ridge, who was despatched to investigate.  The strata in which the footprints were found have been dated to approximately 135 million years ago (Hauterivian faunal stage).  Fossils of dinosaurs in Lower Cretaceous strata in North America are relatively rare, compared to Upper Cretaceous finds.

The footprints are of a big theropod (meat-eating dinosaur), most likely to be a member of the Allosauridae.  Some of these large three-toed prints are a metre long, indicating an animal the size of an Allosaurus fragilis, perhaps 12 metres long or more.  The second set of prints are the typical more rounded prints of a large sauropod (long-necked dinosaur).  These prints are quite size-able and indicate and animal that could have weighed as much as 40 tonnes.  The third set of smaller dinosaur prints have yet to be identified.

Jurassic Highway

Commenting on the importance of this discovery, McCrea said: “we’ve been waiting for this kind of find,” . “It was a long time coming.”

Footprints and trackways are known as trace fossils.  They preserve evidence of the activity of animals.  They have a major advantage over other types of fossils such as bones and teeth (body fossils).  Unlike body fossils, in which the body may be transported a long way after death, far away from the area where the animal or plant actually lived, most trace fossils are direct, in situ evidence of the environment, time and place where the animal lived.

A Large Theropod Footprint (Hell Creek Formation USA)

Potential tyrannosaurid Print.

Picture credit: Dr Phil Manning (Manchester University)

The picture above shows the discovery of a single theropod footprint in Upper Cretaceous sediment.  The dinosaur that made the print has yet to be formerly identified but this could be the footprint of a Tyrannosaurus.

To read more about the finding of a possible tyrannosaur footprint: Possible T. rex Footprint Found.

Trackways of a large theropod in situ with a sauropod such as these uncovered in B.C. have never before been found in Canada, although McCrea has found sauropod tracks in the same region in 2000.  Evidence of big carnivore such as an Allosaurus has been found in the province as well as in neighbouring Alberta, but this trackway discovery is still very significant for palaeontologists.

Trackways can tell researchers much more about a dinosaur than the finding of a single, isolated bone.  “When you compare it to finding a single bone … finding a trackway is like finding a whole skeleton,” McCrea added.

“You get far more information from it.  You can learn about herding behaviour, predator-prey interactions. We get to do a little more on the biological end of things like bio-mechanics … how they walked around.”

McCrea and his assistant plan to spend a fortnight at the site, and will make a latex mould of the footprints to take back to Tumbler Ridge. They will also take three-dimensional photos of the footprints and map the trackways, but they will not actually be removing them, as to remove them may damage these valuable items, evidence that dinosaurs walked around British Columbia 135 million years ago.

For dinosaur models and figures including tyrannosaurs: PNSO Age of Dinosaurs Figures and Models.

Notes on Hypsilophodon – one of the most studied of all Dinosaurs

With the recent new research into the intercostal plates on Hypsilophodon being published we thought it an appropriate time to produce a brief article on Hypsilophodon a small, bipedal ornithopod whose importance to palaeontologists is often overlooked.

At least two species of Hypsilophodon are known, the best known and the one with the most fossil material is Hypsilophodon foxii, however, a second species of Hypsilophodon – H. wielandi has been identified from an isolated femur (thigh bone) found in the USA, but this identification and interpretation has been disputed by a number of scientists as the fossil is indeterminate.

The first remains of any hypsilophodontid to be discovered were found in the a slab of sandstone from the coast of the Isle of Wight in 1849.  The remains, which consisted of a partial skeleton were first thought to be of a young Iguanodon, an animal that had been described in 1825 and whose fossils had been found in the same strata.  By 1868 several near complete skeletons had been recovered from the same area by the amateur naturalist the Reverend William Fox.

This new material displayed several characteristics not known in Iguanodontids and it was proposed that these fossils plus the one found in 1849 did in fact represent a new species of Iguanodon.  This dinosaur was named Iguanodon foxii in honour of the Reverend’s work.

Another renowned English scientist, Thomas Henry Huxley noted that these “miniature iguanodontids” had many differences between them and other known Iguanodon species.  One notable difference was the teeth which were narrower and more sharply pointed than Iguanodon teeth.  This prompted Huxley to rename this dinosaur in 1896. He called it Hypsilophodon foxii.  The name means “high ridge tooth” in recognition of one of its most distinguishing features.  The name is pronounced – hip-sih-low-foh-don.

In 1882, James W Hulke published a paper in the highly influential scientific journal – “The Quarterly Proceedings of the Geological Society”.  He concluded that this little dinosaur was adapted for climbing over rocks and living in trees because of its long fingers and toes plus it could use its tail as a counterbalance, a bit like a modern tree-kangaroo.

A number of other anatomical features were described including the fact that Huxley believed that the first digit of the foot was reversed like a bird’s hallux claw.  This would have helped Hypsilophodon to perch on branches.  We now know this was an inaccurate interpretation and Hypsilophodon was a fleet-footed and most definitely terrestrial dinosaur.

Hypsilophodon – a Dinosaur Model Set?

CollectA Hypsilophodon family group.

To view the CollectA model range: CollectA Prehistoric Life Models.

So much Hypsilophodontidae material has been recovered from one particular area of the Isle of Wight that the strata has been named the Hypsilophodon bed, it is unusual to find so many vertebrates preserved together in one place, the specimens show little sign of attack by scavengers and it has been suggested that these animals represent part of a herd that became trapped and perished in some inter-tidal quicksand.

Article on new Hypsilophodon research: New Insight into Hypsilophodon.

New Study Suggests Hypsilophodon was built for Speed

Today at the Beijing Olympics, attention turns to the beautiful National stadium affectionately called the Birds Nest Stadium as the track and field events get underway.  The heats for the 100 metres will be taking place, who will be the fastest runner on the planet?  Few commentators and pundits expect the British athletes to be amongst the medals for this particular event.  However, a new study by scientists, shows that one ancient resident of Great Britain could have given the top sprinters a run for their money.

Hypsilophodon

Although it would have stood only waist-high next to an Olympic sprinter, the small British ornithopod Hypsilophodon foxii had a fair turn of speed, and new research suggests it even may have possessed a special adaptation that prevented its ribs from rattling during its speedy runs.

This new paper, published in the scientific journal Cretaceous research helps shed light on a mystery surrounding this small, agile dinosaur.  A number of mineralised plates have been found in association with Hypsilophodon fossils.  It had been speculated that these were scutes, pieces of dermal armour that were embedded in the skin of this lightweight dinosaur.  However, such armour would have only provided limited protection from fierce meat-eating carnivores such as Neovenator and other members of the Allosauridae.  More importantly, the heavy armour would have slowed this animal down and seemed to contrast with other anatomical adaptations seen in the numerous fossil skeletons of this dinosaur that indicate a fast running animal.

These thin mineralised plates, once believed to be pieces of body armour may actually have been robust cartilage tissues that may have supported the ribs and helped regulate breathing, especially as Hypsilophodon exerted a lot of energy, running for example.

“Hypsilophodon had elongated legs and a stiffened counterbalancing tail that suggest it was almost certainly a fast runner” commented Richard Butler one of the co-authors of the study.  Richard, a member of the palaeontological team at London’s Natural History Museum added; “the plates might have functioned to support the ribcage during fast running”.

Hypsilophodon remains are relatively common in Lower Cretaceous strata of both Europe and America.  The Hypsilophodonts were a highly successful group and a number of superbly preserved fossil specimens are known.  This animal was named and described in 1869.  At the time of its formal classification, British Zoologist Thomas Huxley commented that with its five-fingered hands and light body this dinosaur could have lived in trees.  A number of illustrations were made of this arboreal dinosaur and depictions of Hypsilophodon sitting comfortably on a conifer branch can be found in many old dinosaur text books from the 1970s and 1980s.

A Small Model of the Dinosaur Called Hypsilophodon

CollectA Hypsilophodon family group.

The model (above) is part of the: CollectA Prehistoric Life Model Range.

Previous descriptions of Hypsilophodon fossils describe these little plates as components of dermal armour, perhaps a double row of plates running down the spine.  Now Butler and his associates have a different explanation for the finding of these items with fossils of this particular dinosaur.  The team noted that the plates were weakly constructed and overlaid but were not actually fused to the ribs.  Butler explained the previous interpretations by saying:  “that as the body of the dead Hypsilophodon individual rotted and collapsed…the bones from the skin came to be closely associated with the internal bones.”

“Our careful reexamination of the specimens shows, however, that the bony plates are always closely associated with the outside surface of the ribs from the front end of the ribcage and are certainly not armour,” he added.

The Natural History Museum scientists believe the plates were similar to the bony structures referred to as “uncinate processes,” seen in the rib-cages of many modern birds.  Although it is not clear whether dinosaurs had the same breathing systems as birds.  Since this feature is involved in bird ribcage support, facilitating movement and breathing, the scientists now suspect the structures played a similar role in the dinosaur.

Diagrams show part of the scapula and ribs of a Hypsilophodon specimen from the London Natural History Museum, the scapula (shoulder blade is labelled “scap”, ribs are labelled as are the mineralised plates “pl”.  They do seem to be closely associated with the rib bones and not likely to be dermal armour that has fallen into the skeleton as the animal’s flesh decomposed.  Perhaps they are intercostal plates helping to regulate breathing during arduous exercise.

The British team have suggested that because evidence for similar mineralised plates has been detected in other dinosaur skeletons, the researchers further theorise that all small-bodied, bird-footed dinosaurs possessed these structures.

Darren Naish, of the University of Portsmouth’s School of Earth & Environmental Sciences, is also intrigued by the fact that the structures could be “widespread, possibly even universal” in other small, herbivorous dinosaurs.

Naish added, “People have mostly forgotten about these ‘armour plates’ in recent decades, but this new work shows that a fresh look at old specimens can still reveal new information on even the best known of dinosaurs”.

Giant Prehistoric Kangaroos and other Beasts wiped out by First Australians

The debate over the impact of human migration as humans encounter indigenous species has been fuelled once more with the publication of a new paper speculating on the demise of the mega-fauna that once lived on the island of Tasmania.

The research, carried out by a joint Australian and British team, has been published in the prestigious American scientific journal – Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.  The research team have concluded it was the impact of human settlement and hunting that led to the extinction of many of the large animals on Tasmania, not climate change as had been previously argued.

Australian Mega-Fauna

It was the chance discovery of the remains of a giant prehistoric kangaroo that proved to be the catalyst for the study.  The researchers postulate that it was the human settlers who hunted to death this slow breeding animal and other very large mammals that lived on Tasmania at the time.

For a long time the fauna and flora of Tasmania had been isolated from the rest of Australia but as sea levels fell a land bridge formed between this island and mainland Australia, permitting people to settle in this area.  The arrival of such a proficient and capable predator such as man, would have had a major impact on the local ecosystem.

Human Involvement?

The debate regarding the significance of human settlement on the island’s mega-fauna centres on the skull of a giant kangaroo found in a cave in the thick rain-forest of the rugged northwest of Tasmania eight years ago.

Scientists dated the find at 41,000 years old, some 2,000 years after humans first began to live in the area.

“Up until now, people thought that the Tasmanian mega-fauna had actually gone extinct before people arrived on the island,” a member of the British and Australian study, Professor Richard Roberts, commented.

Professor Roberts and his team, considering the date of the skull, had concluded that it was likely that hunting not climate change and resulted in so many extinctions.  Large animals that perished around this time included the giant kangaroo, a wombat (another marsupial), the size of a cow and the fierce marsupial lions that were the top predators on the island prior to the arrival of man.

A Marsupial Lion

An articulated skeleton of a marsupial lion is shown in the picture, the animal is facing to the right and the strong, powerful skull can be seen in the top of the picture.  Note the huge front limbs, used to hold and overpower their prey.  The marsupial lion or Thylacoleo was perhaps the largest mammalian predator of the Australian Pleistocene, it terrorised Australia until extinction approximately 40,000 years ago.

Tasmania may have been one of the last places that a size-able population of these carnivores existed – although some people believe that marsupial lions still exist.  There have been a number of mysterious sightings and reports of large, four-footed animals across Australia, could the Thylacoleo still exist?

Discussing the potential influence of climate change on the Tasmanian ecosystem of 40,000 years ago, Professor Roberts, stated that the idea relating sudden climate change to the extinction of many of the large animals was disputed by the fact the area had a very stable climate over this critical time period.

“Things were very climatically stable in that part of Australia and yet the mega-fauna still managed to go extinct,” the Professor pointed out. “So it’s down to humans of one sort or another.”

Slow Reproduction

Roberts said because the large animals were slow to reproduce it would not have required an aggressive campaign to see them quickly die out, however, frequent predation over a sustained period would eventually put pressure on a species to survive.  The large herbivores of Tasmanian would have not encountered humans before and would not have had any natural defences or instinctive responses towards them.

Animals rapidly declining in the face of a new threat is quite common amongst isolated, island populations.  The Dodo for example, was wiped out in just a few years following the first human visitors to the island, there was some hunting, but rodents and dogs that arrived with the settlers were perhaps the main cause of this huge bird’s demise.

“A lot of people still have in their minds an axe-wielding, spear-wielding people, bloodthirsty, out there slaughtering all over the place — it wasn’t like that at all,” Professor Roberts said.

“It was basically just one joey (baby kangaroo) in the pot for Christmas. And that’s all you’ve got to go to do to drive slow-breeding species to extinction.”

Roberts said the Tasmanian results back up the theory that man was responsible for the death of the mega-fauna on mainland Australia, estimated by some to have occurred shortly after human occupation about 46,000 years ago.

The Mass Extinction of Giant Animals

The reasons behind the mass extinction of giant animals, which took place around the world towards the end of the last ice age, has been hotly contested with theories ranging from climate change to human and extraterrestrial impacts.

The finding of the latest study has already been contested, with Judith Field of the University of Sydney saying the idea that humans killed the giant creatures was “in the realms of speculative fantasy”.

“Humans cannot even be placed at the scene,” she told the Sydney Morning Herald.

It is likely that the debate over the impact of human arrival and settlement on other species will continue.  H. sapiens in various parts of the world and at various times, may have had a significant impact on habitats and ecosystems.

Whether it is the debate over the effect of Clovis man in North America, or the influence of the Cro-Magnons over European fauna, scientists will continue to theorise over the actual significance of a human population over the rest of the ecosystem.  Certainly, there is no doubt that today, humans are having an enormous impact on the planet’s other inhabitants.

At 6.7 billion we are the most common large mammal on Earth and our exploitation of resources and demands for food and living space are having a serious impact on virtually ever other species.  Indeed, some scientists have claimed that this is the period of the “sixth great mass extinction” of the Phanerozoic (visible life), with an estimated 50 species a day becoming extinct.

To view models of extinct animals: Prehistoric Animal Models.